Deepika Padukone4 TOTAL
I am surprised about many other answers given here. Nevertheless I am of the opinion that she is not beautiful enough to be a Bollywood actress purely judging by her looks. She is not “above average". She is just “average". I won't say she is ugly. I won't say she is the least beautiful of Bollywood actresses. We have people like Kareena Kapoor whom I would grade lower. She was surviving based on her make up. Now she is established and can survive without great looks. But she “was" surviving based on make up given looks. But the point is, being just an “average",any other average or above average girls could have stood where she is now... If it's to be based on only looks! And no... I am not bringing her complexion here unless certain other twisted people here. Beauty is not depended on complexion in general. It's more to do with facial structure and to do with attractive body. BTW... I am of the opinion that she lacks in certain parameters concerning her body(i think people know what that is and I hope I don't have to elaborate) ... which also makes her .unattractive to me! (having a lean body Aline doesn't make someone above average) So why is she an actress then? Acting skills-she is definitely more talented than the likes of Katrina Kaif for sure. But I don't she is a “topper" there in that aspect too. Come on, seriously! In this population of half a billion Indian women, she cannot be “top ten". She has skills of a decent school level drama actor., that's all. So why is she in Bollywood? Honestly, I haven't figured that out yet. Lookwise she is only OK . Maybe she had inside connections and when presented with make up, she is good to look at and she has decent skills too! Maybe that's more important-you need to have inside connections, you need to be in the right place at the right time and luck should favour you too!